This case is pretty straightforward and the decision is no surprise. But you can't blame a guy for trying.
Acosta pled guilty to attempted burglary of a car, a felony under Penal Code section 459. After the November 2014 passage of Proposition 47, he petitioned the trial court to reduce his conviction to a misdemeanor pursuant to PC 1170.18.
Although 1170.18 suffers from logorrhea, the test for eligibility is a simple one: if Acosta committed his crime of conviction today, would it necessarily be a misdemeanor? If so, he is eligible. If not, he is not eligible. And if Acosta committed an attempted burglary of a car today, it would not necessarily be a misdemeanor, it would be a wobbler.
His attempt to shoehorn his offense into the shoplifting statute, PC 459.5, fails. As does his equal protection argument.
No comments:
Post a Comment